.
Feedback

Why Did You Vote Tuesday? Or Why Didn't You?

Tell us why you voted—or chose not to—in the primary election that included candidates for U.S. president and legislators, and key state offices.

What was it that kept voters from the polls Tuesday?

The number of registered voters who came out to cast their ballots yesterday hovered at around 20 percent for both Allegheny and Washington counties.

The dry and typically spring weather can't be blamed for the light voter turnout.

So was it apathy? Being disenfranchised with the slate of candidates? Convinced it wasn't worth effort since Romney and Obama were 'going to win' the party nomination anyhow? Not worried about federal and state legislative offices? Unhappy with the tone of politics?

In Allegheny County, which has 888,686 registered voters, a mere 19.34 percent turned out to cast their ballots, according to the county's Division of Elections website. Of those 171,916 voters, 37.26 percent were Republicans, 62.69 were Democrats and .05 percent were nonpartisan voters.

But a higher percentage of registered Republicans turned out to vote compared to registered Democrats. According to unofficial results, 26.37 percent of registered Republicans voted, but only 19.9 percent of Democrats cast their ballots Tuesday.

In 2008, when the last presidential primary was held, voter turnout was 41.51 percent, more than double the percentage voting Tuesday.

Results for Washington County were similar. Only 20.72 percent of the 139,738 registered voters went to the polls yesterday—a mere 28,959 residents, according to the county election office staff.

But the office's website archives show in the last presidential primary, 56,389 of 134,152 registered voters turned out, roughly double the number at 42.03 percent.

Did you vote yesterday? Tell us why you went to the polls in the comments section below.

If you didn't vote, tell us that, too. We're interested in finding out your reasons. And do you plan to vote in November?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Forest Hills-Regent Square Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Nettie Jane April 26, 2012 at 12:35 pm
I voted because my sisters went to prison, were force fed, and died for my right to do so. Onward and forward Mr. President I am on your team!!
Mike Jones April 26, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Roger... I would put that number of undecideds even lower. It seems like our political opinions are so polarized right now that I wouldn't be surprised if less than 10 percent of voters are still pondering their choice for president. That's a razor-thin slice of the American population.
Zandy Dudiak (Editor) April 26, 2012 at 01:13 pm
I, too, am an independent. According to Gallop.com, "the percentage of Americans identifying as political independents increased in 2011, as is common in a non-election year, although the 40% who did so is the highest Gallup has measured, by one percentage point. More Americans continue to identify as Democrats than as Republicans, 31% to 27%. That shows a growing dissatisfaction with the two-party system." As long as the two major parties remain viewed as conservative and liberal, I think people with more moderate viewpoints will continue to leave. We, as a nation, have lost the ability to compromise. And that scares me.
Mary Matsuura April 26, 2012 at 03:16 pm
I agree with many of the opinions reflected here by the Independents. I'm a registered Democrat but I don't follow the party religiously. I am basically liberal, which to me means I care about our society more than myself. I vote because without my vote I'll have less of a chance to see the changes I believe in. I don't vote to cancel out someone from another party! I vote in hopes of raising that low number of voters turning out, those who are selecting our leaders for the majority. I vote so that this changes and my vote is the least I can do. I also volunteer!!!
Mike Jones April 26, 2012 at 04:45 pm
Well said, Zandy... I couldn't agree more.
Joseph April 26, 2012 at 06:22 pm
I find it scary that we allow two parties to control OUR country. I take voting very seriously. A vote is support, approval-- delegating authority to act in your best interest.
I only vote for those I fully support, which is usually not many people at all. I've been registered only to participate in the primary election, but this was my last. I'm so fed up with the two-party system. Could George Washington's words ring more true? "However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion." And we allow this to happen out of fear because 'we can't let the other person win.' Forget the cliches, the democracy that has been fought and sacrificed for has been lost. Voting without principle only enables further degradation of the political process. As John Quincy Adams said, “Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” While some say those that do not vote waste their vote and have no right to complain, I say the contrary and those that do not vote out of principle cherish their vote and have every right to complain.
Erin Faulk (Editor) April 26, 2012 at 07:20 pm
Agreed. Well said.
MSgt. John DeLallo April 27, 2012 at 04:30 am
Well said. I cannot fathom how folks can view an ocean of miniature American flags flying over gravesites on Memorial Day, get choked up, but on election day, they sit home on their arses. As one pundit quipped, two fellows were talking about our voter turnout. One said he thought that ignorance and apathy had finally overtaken the American spirit. The other replied he didn't know about that, and actually didn't care. It was meant as a joke, but its simply not funny. I vote for my 5 grandkids, for they will inherit the good, or bad, judgement shown by the "class of 2012" in Harrisburg and in Washington, D.C.
Mike April 27, 2012 at 02:45 pm
Voting is never pointless. Ever.
Mike April 27, 2012 at 02:49 pm
Independents choose to not be a member of a political party. So why would they vote on who would lead a party?
It'd be like voting to elect a leader of a club that you don't belong to. If you want to vote in a primary then join a political party.
A single primary date would mean only candidates with a ton of money would be able to afford to run for President. As much as I know you do not like Rick Santorum, he was able to be competitive with a very small amount of money because the initial states are small and rely on grassroots campaigning. One National primary date would mean he would not have been able to afford to be competitive. If you remember, in the last Presidential election, a guy no one had heard of was able to be competitive in the early primaries. I think he did pretty good after that, if my memory is correct.
Mike Jones April 27, 2012 at 04:43 pm
ML... Unless you lived in Brookline, there were no special elections or ballot initiatives. Our election process will remain incomplete until Pennsylvania adopts an open primary system that many other states have already implemented.
Mike Jones April 27, 2012 at 07:30 pm
I always thought the point of voting was to select someone to lead a city, state or country. Thanks for clarifying that for me.
Roger April 28, 2012 at 01:25 am
This thread has many good comments. Perhaps a basic question needs to have an answer: What is the purpose of primary elections?
A good, solid and well-founded answer may go a long way to help address the concerns about open primaries, independents, etc. Anybody?
Mike Jones April 28, 2012 at 03:09 am
I think the best idea would be to have a system that pulls the top three candidates from a preliminary vote in the spring and let the general public vote on those winner. What say you, Roger?
William McCloskey April 28, 2012 at 02:43 pm
... Sometimes you have to hold your nose while you vote, but if you don't vote the entrenched fixers are guaranteed to win
Be May 9, 2012 at 12:30 am
Because "representative democracy" is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind. The ruling class has never changed and never will. Now instead of declaring themselves king by the grace of god or at the point of a sword, you sanction them king with your vote, and that makes you feel as if you matter, when you really dont.. Government is a money making enterprise. Always has been, and always will be, however fair seeming the form it appears to take. The only thing that changes is the faces, so it appears different, but it never changes. Like any going concern, its sole purpose is to perpetuate its continued existence. Same old story with a different cast, so you can feel good about yourself in your mind, So the little people can feel important, like they matter, but in truth you're just tools in a scam that goes back to beginning of man.
Maybe I should move somewhere where despotism can be taken whole, without the base alloy of hipocrisy. That is why I dont vote, wont vote, because I know i don't matter.I don't need to feel like I matter. If i do, I only sanction a business whose product I do not want to buy. Their power to abuse is given through your sanctioning of that power, your vote is their power. So for all of these whiners and complainers about government abuses, its your fault if you vote.
Be May 9, 2012 at 12:51 am
I care about society more than myself. Ok. Say you had a choice. Society could be perfect in every way you could possibly imagine. It could be a neo socialist utopia where everyone was the same or whatever the stated liberal agenda is these days. But the price is that you and your whole family and everyone you knew had to be sacrificed to obtain that goal. It can be the way you want, but you can't be a part of it, and the decision would be yours alone to make. Still think you care more about society than yourself? I think not.
Your statement is in direct violation of the law of human nature
Alexander M. Cianfracco May 9, 2012 at 01:41 am
"Be", your hipster logic makes me sick. Instead of actually getting involved and making changes from within the system, it's easier for you to sit and complain about how unfair the system is to you. Living in a society means everything isn't always exactly what you want, so suck it up and stop whining.
Coward.
Mike Jones May 9, 2012 at 03:17 am
ML... My point remains for the 100 other municipalities in Allegheny County, and the countless others across the state.
Mike May 9, 2012 at 12:01 pm
Mike - That's what voting in the general election is. A primary election is partially used to determine who will lead your chosen party.
Mike May 9, 2012 at 12:03 pm
Independents crack me up
JustMe May 9, 2012 at 04:38 pm
ML, she probably did a typo and meant to type things.
Mike Jones May 9, 2012 at 04:51 pm
Thanks for holding my feet to the fire. There were six special elections (out of 203 state House seats) in Pennsylvania. Besides your 22nd District, four were in Philly and the other was in Allentown... http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Pennsylvania_state_legislative_special_elections,_2012
Since you brought up the ballot initiatives, do you mind doing a little research to see how many independents across the state could vote on a referendum? I'm really curious to know.
Be May 10, 2012 at 05:34 pm
The system is the problem sir. I dont complain about unfairness ever sir. Thats the realm of your people. The system doesnt affect me one tiny bit. I dont live and die off the government teet, like you and your people do. You have never one time heard me complain about how what government does affects me. I accept the reality of what government is. If it screws me, i live with it, if it helps me, i live with it. But either way, I do not sanction it. The bottom line is you support government that you perceive as helping you, at the expense of others in the society. Government is not designed to do what is best for everyone. It has never been the purpose of it and never will be. You sir are the coward. You use government to get you what you want, at the expense of others. Every person who votes is looking to get something from government. Thats why you see 40% turnout. Because the only people voting are out to get something by the most heinous and cowardly method possible. Using government to get it, which means stealing it from someone else. That is all government does. Takes from one portion of society to give to another portion of society. Liberal, conservative, it matters not. The only that matters is who gets the money.
Be May 10, 2012 at 05:34 pm
Do the food stamp, union, government employee, entitlement class get the money? Or does the wall street, military industrial complex class get the money. This about 40% of american society. Thus 40%-50% turnout, along with "civic duty" suckers. The only people that vote feel they can get something from government. The only people who "get involved" are getting something, or at least feel they might get something, or feel they might get something taken from them. Government should not be in the business of giving and taking. But, that is exactly what its business is.
Mike Jones May 10, 2012 at 05:58 pm
Mike... So the solution is multiple parties (I'm talking six or seven). Three parties ain't gonna cut it because independents have a wide range of beliefs and values.
Do you think the entrenched players from the two parties would ever let that happen?
*JB* May 10, 2012 at 06:53 pm
Maybe Mr. President's slogan should be "Backward". That is certainly the direction he and his administration have taken our country. Hopefully we will be able to vote in a candidate and an administration with a pro-business agenda and put a stop to the endless regulations imposed on business which affects all of us. Looks like it's time to pull the "R" lever at the polls and create massive job opportunities again. So long Mr. President......
Be May 10, 2012 at 10:35 pm
running an independent slate would require doing a handstand inward 4 1/2 in the pike position off the springboard. "party business" doesnt make that possible.
Be May 10, 2012 at 10:42 pm
yes. stay home independents. let the smart folks on the government teet vote. i agree with jon wain. its one or the other.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
victoria impavido June 15, 2013 at 03:17 pm
You might try looking behind the apartments on the Sherman block (1900 block of Monongahela) becauseRead More there are always stray cats behind there. Don't go alone because it doesn't look very safe. Start looking behind the Boomerang bar all the way to behind Maldini's.
Mary June 13, 2013 at 10:38 pm
I've been going to Frick Park for over 40 years and I've seen plenty of off-leash dogs lunge at eachRead More other. And I don't care how cute you think your dog is I don't want it coming up and sniffing me.
Troy Gavazzi June 14, 2013 at 07:17 am
Shannon, your comment welcoming RPD "finally bringing some sanity" implies that the restRead More of us lack it. Wy would you think that people who want illegal and dangerous activities eliminated and enforced? The fact is that many have had dangerous and even harmful encounters with unleashed dogs even though you "have never seen it". I do agree with you that we should all "just go to the park and have some fun". That would best be done of all dog owners kept their dogs properly leashed and utilize the OLEAs.
Erin Corbett June 17, 2013 at 02:20 pm
I have two small terriers who, as being terriers, must be leashed at all times while outside due toRead More their strong instinct to search out squirrels, chimpunks, and other small rodents. The only time I take them off-leash is in the designated area that is fenced, and they always have a great time. My husband and I decided after one of these visits to walk a few miles on the trails, which we'd never done before. And I can honestly say that we will never do it again. My dogs are friendly with other dogs when all involved are off-leash, but my smallest dog gets quite insecure when she is leashed and a strange dog approaches her. I mean, if you were restrained and a complete stranger approached you without any warning, it would be quite startling! Such as it is for my little one. In order to prevent a possible altercation, I have to physically scoop her up because when she gets frightened it's possible that she could bite. She IS an animal. We have to remember this. Anyway, this particular day on the trails got off to quite a horrible start, as we were walking along and an off-leash dog approached and appeared to be stalking toward my dogs. Its owner made no attempt to restrain him or her and only yelled out that the dog was friendly. My smallest dog sensed the other dog's energy and jumped up on my legs to be picked up. I did so, and the other dog CHARGED me and my dog. My husband was trying to restrain our other dog, who was now barking at this off-leash dog, and the entire experience left me extremely shaken up. I informed the man that it was against the law to have his dog off-leash and he was not in the least apologetic. Shannon, the only thing I agree with about your comments is that yes, we should all be able to just get along. Although most dogs were off-leash this day at the park, a vast majority of people, when they saw us approaching, would leash their dogs. For that, I really appreciate it. But for everyone's safety I really do think that people need to start obeying the law and leashing their dogs at all times, except in the designated areas. It's for their safety as well as the safety of everyone else using the park. Thank you.
Zandy Dudiak (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 04:33 pm
Sorry, you'll have to cut and paste the link!
Patti Amato June 5, 2013 at 04:44 pm
Beautiful 2003 Lincoln Aviator for Sale. See it on craigslist:Read More http://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/cto/3814108799.html